
The Bates Method Is Not Eye Exercises
“Dr. Bates used the holistic approach to cure vision problems. He taught people with poor vision how to release the strain from their eyes and mind thereby improving or perfecting their vision. At its core, the method consists of applying relaxed vision habits all day long, it’s not a regimen of eye exercises. While eye exercises are beneficial in some cases, they are not an effective way to overcome the eyestrain that leads to poor vision.”
– Esther Joy van der Werf, from the Foreword to “Better Eyesight: The Original Magazines as published by Dr. William H. Bates, July 1919 – June 1930”
I am over 65. Among folks my age, with a history of poor eyesight, it is not an uncommon story to have discovered long ago, while wandering through a used bookstore, “The Cure Of Imperfect Sight By Treatment Without Glasses” (or its revised edition, “The Bates Method For Better Eyesight Without Glasses”) by Dr. William H. Bates. Took it off the shelf. Dusted it off. Opened it. Got excited. Bought it. Read it. Tried it. And found it didn’t work. Then years later, after being reintroduced to the Bates method, and receiving guidance from a Bates method teacher, finding that yes indeed, it does work, when approached in the right way.
Improving our eyesight on our own by reading a book on the Bates method rarely works. Why? Because, in the isolation of our own limited experience, all too often we interpret the Bates method as eye exercises, which it is not.
The Bates Method Is Not Eye Exercises
It’s natural to believe we must work hard to accomplish anything of importance. So it follows, we believe we must work hard to improve our vision. From the beginning, ophthalmologist William H. Bates was misunderstood, and his “method” for vision improvement misinterpreted as “eye exercises.” After all, something as importance as eyesight must require work to improve.
But it was not work that Dr. Bates recommended. It was rest. Rest of the eyes, and more importantly, rest of the mind.
Eye Exercises Don’t Address Mental Strain
Over 100 years ago, Dr. Bates discovered that a common cause or contributing factor to all vision problems was mental strain. He found that mental strain was at the root of nearly every one of his patient’s eyesight conditions. And the first thing that Dr. Bates had them do when they walked into his New York City eye clinic, no matter their condition, was rest. Rest the eyes, and as importantly, rest the mind.
All of Dr. Bates’ patients suffered from mental strain. Along with their physical eye conditions, they had many types of mental strain, including worry, anxiety, depression, sadness, frustration, anger and fear.
Typically, the first thing Dr. Bates had them do, was close their eyes. With their eyes closed, he tried whatever he could to help them relax their mind and as well as their eyes.
- He would ask them to remember or imagine seeing clearly,
- mentally noticing details,
- picturing black, white, or a favorite color,
- seeing gentle movement,
- remembering beautiful scenes,
- favorite places and happy moments,
- thinking of kind people and cherished pets,
- anyone or anything that made them feel good and brought a smile to their face.
He had them think pleasant thoughts, relax their mind and relax while their eyes, while they were closed, while they were palming, sunning, swinging and doing various relaxation practices.
Dr. Bates did not have them perform exercises. He did not have them exercise their eyes. He knew it was not exercise that they needed, but relief from their mental strain. He addressed this first. And as their mental strain was relieved, their eye strain was relieved and their vision improved.
A good example of this is the very first article that Dr. Bates wrote in the very first issue of Better Eyesight magazine titled “The Flashing Cure.”
The Flashing Cure
From Better Eyesight, July 1919, A Monthly Magazine Devoted To The Prevention And Cure Of Imperfect Sight Without Glasses by Wiliam H. Bates, M.D.
Do you read imperfectly? Can you observe then that when you look at the first word, or the firs letter, of a sentence you do not see best where you are looking, that you see other words, or other letters, just as well as or better than the ones you are looking at? Do you observe also that the harder you try to see the worse you see?
Now close your eyes and rest them, remembering some color, like black or white, that you can remember perfectly. Keep them closed until they feel rested, or until the feeling of strain has been completely relieved. Now open them and look at the first word or letter of a sentence for a fraction of a second. If you have been able to relax, partially or completely, you will have a flash of improved o clear vision, and the area seen best will be smaller.
After opening the eyes for this fraction of a second, close them again quickly, still remembering the color, and keep them closed until they again feel rested. Then again open them for a fraction of a second. Continue this alternate resting of the eyes and flashing of the letters for a time, and you may soon find that you can keep your eyes open longer than a fraction of a second without losing the improved vision.
If your trouble is with distant instead of near vision, use the same method with distant letters.
In this way you can demonstrate for yourself the fundamental principles of the cure of imperfect sight by treatment without glasses.
Eye exercises don’t address the mental strain that leads to eye strain and vision problems. When vision improvement techniques are done in a regimented and calisthenic-like fashion, mental strain can continue, or even increase. Approaching the Bates method as eye exercises, and not addressing mental strain, doesn’t work so well at improving eyesight.
Exercise is not what Dr. Bates intended. He was misunderstood.
The Popularization Of Eye Exercises
Perhaps this early misunderstanding of Dr. Bates’ discoveries was fueled by a misrepresentation of it in the popular culture of the time. At the height of Dr. Bates’ optometry practice, in the very same New York City where he lived and worked, also lived a shrewd and rather notorious publisher of popular magazines and books named Bernarr MacFadden.
In 1918, MacFadden published the book, “Strengthening The Eyes: A New Course In Scientific Eye Training” authored by himself and William H. Bates, M.D. Although Dr. Bates was coauthor, and the book does contain sections with Dr. Bates’ own words and photographs, his usual advice of the need for relaxation is uncharacteristically missing. The technical information which an eye doctor can explain is there, but not the necessity for relaxation of the mind and eyes. It’s difficult to believe Dr. Bates would have neglected emphasizing the importance of relaxation. It’s questionable whether he agreed to the book’s publication as edited.
“Strengthening The Eyes” starts with the premise that eyes with poor eyesight are weak. It then stresses the need to strengthen them, and that only through work and effort can eyesight be improved. It misses Dr. Bates’ primary point and discovery from his many years of study, research and practice, that the mind and eyes of the person with normal clear eyesight are naturally relaxed. And the mind and eyes of the person with poor eyesight are under a great strain and need rest in order to function normally again.
Although Dr. Bates may have contributed to this book, he most likely was not all too happy with its final printing. For in 1924, a new edition of “Strengthening The Eyes” was published by MacFadden which still included material of Dr. Bates, but this time without Dr. Bates’ name attached. Although “Strengthening The Eyes” was popular, sold a lot of copies and had further editions, never again was Dr. Bates’ name mentioned along side MacFadden’s.

This book was not about relaxation of the mind and the eyes. It was about eye exercises. Eye exercises were as popular and over rated then, as they are now.
Looking For A Quick Solution
Also popular today, as I’m sure it was back in Dr. Bates’ day, is the desire and expectation for quick solutions. Perhaps it’s our society, our culture, or just human nature, that we tend to look for an immediate solution to our problems, including poor eyesight.
We want to correct the symptoms. We look for a quick fix, with glasses, contacts, surgeries and drugs. Correcting the symptoms may help for a time, but eventually, as symptoms get worse, and discomfort greater, or we experience bad side-effects, these quick fix solutions are less acceptable.
Unlike lenses, surgeries and drugs, eye exercises promise vision improvement, not just correction, without side-effects. We hear testimonials. We may personally know someone who has improved their eyesight with eye exercises. They may be beneficial. But, since they do not address eyestrain, they are still not getting to the root of the problem. To quoter Esther joy van der Werf again, “While eye exercises are beneficial in some cases, they are not an effective way to overcome the eyestrain that leads to poor vision.”
My Own Misinterpretation Of The Bates Method As Eye Exercises
As I have written in My Story, my introduction to the Bates method and to eyesight improvement was through the book, “Relearning To See: Improve Your Eyesight Naturally!” by Thomas R. Quackenbush. It’s an excellent and thorough book on the subject. I am grateful to have found it. It inspired me to begin my vision improvement journey.
Even though Thomas Quackenbush never used the word “exercise” in his book, and repeated over and over the importance of practicing good vision habits all day long and incorporating them into daily life, I still approached the Bates method as eye exercises.
During a three-week vacation, I eagerly read the entire book and diligently practiced the vision improvement techniques. It was wonderful to have the uninterrupted time to study and practice, during which my blur miraculously disappeared and my vision returned to normal.

One sunny Spring morning my normal vision returned. The world became crystal clear, colorful and beautiful again. And, I could read with ease and clarity. But, the clarity didn’t last. For three days my eyesight was normal, then it reverted to the usual blur that I had come to expect and was familiar with.
Amazingly, my eyesight remained normal and clear for three days. But following my “retreat,” after returning home to the stressors of daily life, my blur spontaneously returned. I could clear it by closing my eyes, taking a few relaxed breathes, consciously relaxing my shoulders, neck, face and eyes, and then blinking my eyes open while doing a few short head swings. But the clarity was temporary. It didn’t stick and I didn’t know why. Poor and unhealthy chronic vision habits of strain, that created my blur, had returned.
While studying the Bates method, I had not learned to recognize these poor vision habits. During my three-day clear flash, I was completely relaxed, not just in my eyes, but also in my mind and entire body. When the blur returned, I was straining again to see. But I couldn’t figure out how to completely let the strain go again. I couldn’t remember or feel what it was like in my mind and body. What had I done differently to see with clarity? I couldn’t repeat it.
Reflecting back, I now realize that I was so focused on practicing what to do, that I neglected the importance of becoming aware of what not to do.
Eye Exercises Don’t Address What Eyestrain Does To Eyesight
Unlike eye exercises, the Bates method not only addresses what to do (relax), but also what not to do (strain). It is helpful to practice creating eyestrain on purpose in order to develop an increased awareness of the the eyestrain. It is difficult to let go of eyestrain without an intimate awareness of it.
Straining might include staring, squinting, eccentric fixation (trying to see more than one thing clearly at the same time), tunnel vision (concentrating solely on central vision and neglecting the periphery), mental strain (dwelling on stressful thoughts). Each person may have a different habit, or combination of habits of strain. Becoming familiar with one’s strain patterns is helpful in learning to let them go.
This is the part I missed when first learning about the Bates method. I actually avoided it. It felt counter intuitive to do the very thing that was lowering my vision. And, purposely producing eye strain was really uncomfortable. I didn’t like it one bit. But, not doing it probably held me back from improving my eyesight more quickly. It was a long time until I was able to have a good sense in my body, mind and eyes, of what not to do. Because I wasn’t familiar with what it really felt like to strain, I was often unaware that I was straining, and unconsciously continued to do so for far too long.
There are two things consciously producing eye strain is good for:
- Becoming aware of the sensations of what it feels like in your mind, body and eyes to strain, so that you can learn to let it go, and
- Proving to yourself that strain lowers your vision
Here are a couple of examples of how straining on purpose can be used to demonstrate for oneself that eyestrain makes vision worse. With this knowledge and awareness, one can more readily recognize a strain pattern that is lowering vision and start to let it go.
What Eyestrain Does To Your Sight
From "Optimal Eyesight: "Optimal Eyesight: How To Restore And Retain Great Vision" by Esther Joy van der Werf - Chapter 4, Page 20
It is time to prove the futility of eyestrain to yourself, because personal experience is the best teacher and will convince you more than any theories ever will.
NOTE: Do the following demonstration without glasses or contact lenses. You will need an eye chart [or other printed reading material, like a book or magazine] and perhaps a mirror, as not everyone can sense their own eyestrain even though it is often clearly visible on their face.
Staring Demo
Hold an eye chart [or other printed reading material, like a book or magazine] at the distance where your vision is clearest, then choose any one letter [on the bottom line of the chart or on any line in the book or magazine]. Now, slowly increase the distance at which you hold the chart [book or magazine] until you notice that this letter has become a little blurry. Keep the chart [book or magazine] at that distance.
Okay, now stare at the letter you picked. By staring, I mean you hold your eyes still, fix your gaze on that one letter and avoid blinking. Hold still for ten seconds or longer, if you can.
How did that feel? How much better or worse did you see the letter?
The usual response is that the eyes start burning, they hurt, are uncomfortable, or want to look away. Most people notice the clarity of the letter diminishing, sometimes blurring dramatically.
That is good! I hope you had that experience too. It will help get the message across that staring makes your vision worse.
Close your eyes briefly and blink to let them recover, then do the following test:
Squinting Demo
I am going to challenge you to break one of God's most feared commandments... Just this once!
"The 11th Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Squint." - Mel Brooks
Let's check what the dreaded squinting effort brings you...
Use the same chart [book or magazine], at the same distance where letters appear slightly blurry, look at the same line and just pick another letter for variety.
This time squint at this letter and do your very best to make it become clearer. Try as hard as you can to make the slight blur go away. If it seems to not be working, try a little harder...
If it seems to be working well, KEEP SQUINTING! Keep tensing those eyelids for a whole minute if you can and notice what happens then.
Did you succeed?
Perhaps you did see the letter more clearly for a while, as some people do. But, did the letter stay clear when you kept squinting? And how did your eyes feel after that effort? Is squinting an easy way of seeing? Can you sustain it for any length of time? I seriously doubt it. Typically, the letter will go in and out of focus and your eyes become more and more tired.
If you think squinting worked well for you, tell me something: Is this how you want to use your eyes for the rest of your life??? Check your squinting face in the mirror and answer that last question again...
"You may temporarily improve the sight by effort, but you cannot improve it to normal, and if the effort is allowed to become continuous, the sight will steadily deteriorate." - William H. Bates, M.D."
Squinting your eyelids or straining your face muscles to attempt to balance out the strain on your eye muscles is not a long-term solution, even if such double strain does provide temporarily clearer vision.
When you squint, your eyelids create a narrow slit in front of the pupils, causing a pinhole effect that tends to provide a sharper image. Also, the squinting can affect the shape of the cornea and the eyeball due to the pressure created by the muscles in the eyelids. However, in this case, two negatives (two different forms of strain) do not make a positive! Seeing with artificial clarity gained by squinting is not a natural way of seeing, and it cannot be sustained for long.
Eye Exercises Don’t Address Fear… And Clarity May Be Scary
When clarity suddenly appeared, at first I felt excitement and joy! But then fear crept in. Even though my old habits of eyestrain produced uncomfortable symptoms, including dryness, eye pain, headaches, sunlight sensitivity, and blurry vision, I had been practicing them for such a long time that they, and their ill-effects, were familiar. And that familiarity made me feel safe. I actually found comfort in straining, staring, squinting, in trying to see, and experiencing blur. Physically it hurt. But emotionally it was soothing. As much as I was excited about seeing with miraculous clarity, I was also a bit scared. And my fear made it difficult to maintain the clarity.
My old way of seeing, although blurry, was well-known. It was an “old friend.” But this forgotten way of seeing clearly, although normal, felt new and unknown. Seeing clearly all at once was a big change and rather shocking. Although it made no logical sense, I wondered if I could be harming my eyes by seeing clearly. I needed reassurance, but I was on my own and in unfamiliar territory. I had no help from a vision improvement teacher or coach and knew no of one personally who had been through the process whom I could confide in.
I initially saw the Bates method as merely physical exercises. This mechanical interpretation did nothing to address my fears, which interfered with the process of my achieving and maintaining effortlessly clear vision. And my fears made me hesitant to continue practicing the Bates method techniques.

I remember thinking to myself, “Is this new way of seeing normal? Is it safe for me to do? Will it hurt my eyes?” Although my eyes felt amazingly good and could see clearly, I didn’t trust myself. I was afraid. And I had no one to guide me through this fear of the unknown, to reassure me that “all is well and normal.”
Eventually, I came to realize that the Bates method is harmless. It is simply relearning to use the mind and eyes normally through consciously practicing naturally relaxed mental and visual habits, like breathing, blinking, shifting, seeing with curiosity and interest, paying attention to details, shifting the gaze, recognizing central clarity while maintaining peripheral awareness. It is the process of coaxing out naturally relaxed mental and visual habits in a gentle way.
The Importance Of Learning How To Handle Stress Better
Until I was introduced to the Bates Method, and learned that vision can improve, I had not realized the extent to which stress was affecting my vision. While on vacation, I focused solely on improving my sight, without distraction. But when I returned home, the stresses of life awaited me. I gradually I made the connection, and realized that my poor handling of stress was adversely affecting my eyesight.
I had a long list of mental, emotional and spiritual issues work on, things that I could learn to handle better. If I was to truly let go of the mental and physical strain that was lowering my vision, I realized I had to learn how to handle stress better. Even with the best book on the subject of natural vision improvement, these other things had to be addresses. That would take time.
Although I knew it might take time, I knew my vision would permanently improve. Through my initial experience of independently reading about and exploring the Bates Method, even while having an exercising attitude, my vision did temporarily improve. I learned that vision improvement is possible. I was given a literal glimpse into normal eyesight. I knew that if I did it once I could do it again. And that was exciting and empowering.
Relaxation vs. Effort
The word “exercise” implies work. From the beginning of Dr. Bates’ investigations into eyesight, he discovered and demonstrated that normal eyesight is effortless and just the opposite of work. He discovered that making any amount of effort to see lowers vision.

“Under the present educational system there is a constant effort to compel the children to remember. These efforts always fail. They spoil both the memory and the sight. The memory cannot be forced any more than the vision can be forced. We remember without effort, just as we see without effort, and the harder we try to remember or see the less we are able to do so.”
– William H. Bates M.D., from the September 1919 issue of Better Eyesight Magazine
Noticing the difference between seeing effortlessly and seeing with effort can be challenging. It takes patience, practice and the development of a subtle awareness of the normally relaxed state of the mind and eyes. It’s difficult to just read about and then implement. It’s experiential. It takes consciously practicing techniques that mimic effortless normal eyesight, and doing so in a fun and relaxing way, encouraging and coaxing out a sense of effortlessness. It involves letting go, being in the moment, enjoying the process, staying aware of inner feelings and not obsessively worrying about the end goal. It has little to do with regimented exercises, more to do with surrendering, not trying, stepping out of the way and doing nothing to interfere with nature.
Although the difference between seeing effortlessly and seeing with effort is subtle, Dr. Bates was able to notice it, measure it, and see it in action in his patients, with a retinoscope.
“It can be demonstrated by tests with the retinoscope that all persons with imperfect sight stare, strain, or try to see. To demonstrate this fact: Look intently at one part of a large or small letter at the distance or nearpoint. In a few seconds, usually, fatigue and discomfort will be produced, and the letter will blur or disappear. If the effort tis continued long enough, pain may be produced.”
– William H. Bates, M.D.
He tells an amusing story from the year 1919 in his Better Eyesight magazine of how effort, the “effort” to lie, lowered vision. And how “effortlessly” telling the truth, improved it…
Lying A Cause Of Myopia
From "Better Eyesight, September 1919, A Monthly Magazine Devoted To the Prevention And Cure Of Imperfect Sight Without Glasses" by William H. Bates, M.D.
I may claim to have discovered the fact that telling lies is bad for the eyes. Whatever bearing this circumstance may have upon the universality of defects of vision, it can easily be demonstrated that it is impossible to say what is not true, even with no intent to deceive, or even to imagine a falsehood, without producing an error of refraction.
If a patient can read all the small letters on the bottom line of the test card, and either deliberately or carelessly miscalls any of them, the retinoscope will indicate an error of refraction. In numerous cases patients have been asked to state their ages incorrectly, or to try to imagine that they were a year older, or a year younger, than they actually were, and in every case when they did this the retinoscope indicated an error of refraction. A patient 25 years old had an error of refraction when he looked at a blank wall without trying to see, but if he said he was 26, or if someone else said he was 26, or if he tried to imagine that he was 26, he became myopic. The same thing happened when he stated or tried to imagine that he was 24. When he stated or remembered the truth his vision was normal, but when he stated or imagined an error he had an error of refraction.
Two little girl patients arrived one after the other one day, and the first accused the second of having stopped at Huyler's for an ice-cream soda, which she had been instructed not to do, being somewhat too much addicted to sweets. The second denied the charge, and the first, who had used the retinoscope and knew what it did to people who told lies, said,
"Do take the retinoscope and find out."
"I followed the suggestion, and having thrown the light into the second child's eyes, I asked:'
"Did you go to Huyler's?"
"Yes," was the response, and the retinoscope indicated no error of refraction.
"Did you have an ice-cream soda?"
"No," said the child, but the tell-tale shadow moved in a direction opposite to that of the mirror, showing that she had become myopic and was not telling the truth.
The child blushed when I told her this and acknowledged that the retinoscope was right, for she had heard of the ways of the uncanny instrument before and did not know what else it might do to her if she said anything more that was not true.
The fact is that it requires an effort to state what is not true, and this effort always results in a deviation from the norm in the refraction of the eye. So sensitive is the test that if the subject, whether his vision is ordinarily normal, or not, pronounces the initials of his name correctly while looking at a blank surface without trying to see, there will be no error of refraction, but if he miscalls one initial, even without any consciousness of effort, and with full knowledge that he is deceiving no one, myopia will be produced.
I may claim to have discovered the fact that telling lies is bad for the eyes. Whatever bearing this circumstance may have upon the universality of defects of vision, it can easily be demonstrated that it is impossible to say what is not true, even with no intent to deceive, or even to imagine a falsehood, without producing an error of refraction.
If a patient can read all the small letters on the bottom line of the test card, and either deliberately or carelessly miscalls any of them, the retinoscope will indicate an error of refraction. In numerous cases patients have been asked to state their ages incorrectly, or to try to imagine that they were a year older, or a year younger, than they actually were, and in every case when they did this the retinoscope indicated an error of refraction. A patient 25 years old had an error of refraction when he looked at a blank wall without trying to see, but if he said he was 26, or if someone else said he was 26, or if he tried to imagine that he was 26, he became myopic. The same thing happened when he stated or tried to imagine that he was 24. When he stated or remembered the truth his vision was normal, but when he stated or imagined an error he had an error of refraction.
Two little girl patients arrived one after the other one day, and the first accused the second of having stopped at Huyler's for an ice-cream soda, which she had been instructed not to do, being somewhat too much addicted to sweets. The second denied the charge, and the first, who had used the retinoscope and knew what it did to people who told lies, said,
"Do take the retinoscope and find out."
"I followed the suggestion, and having thrown the light into the second child's eyes, I asked:'
"Did you go to Huyler's?"
"Yes," was the response, and the retinoscope indicated no error of refraction.
"Did you have an ice-cream soda?"
"No," said the child, but the tell-tale shadow moved in a direction opposite to that of the mirror, showing that she had become myopic and was not telling the truth.
The child blushed when I told her this and acknowledged that the retinoscope was right, for she had heard of the ways of the uncanny instrument before and did not know what else it might do to her if she said anything more that was not true.
The fact is that it requires an effort to state what is not true, and this effort always results in a deviation from the norm in the refraction of the eye. So sensitive is the test that if the subject, whether his vision is ordinarily normal, or not, pronounces the initials of his name correctly while looking at a blank surface without trying to see, there will be no error of refraction, but if he miscalls one initial, even without any consciousness of effort, and with full knowledge that he is deceiving no one, myopia will be produced.
Vision Is Primarily Mental
All of our senses are automatic. We don’t have to consciously do anything in order to hear, feel, taste, smell or see. It just happens spontaneously and effortlessly. We passively receive information from our environment and our mind subconsciously does the rest, instantly putting the millions of bits of information together into something we can immediately use to understand and navigate our world.
Our senses are primarily mental. And the more relaxed our mind, the better our senses perceive. All of our senses work best, including vision, when we are mentally relaxed.

“When the mind is able to remember perfectly any phenomenon of the senses, it is always perfectly relaxed.”
– William H. Bates, M.D.
Dr. Bates stated, “All methods of curing errors of refraction are simply different ways of obtaining rest.” By “rest,” he not only meant rest of the eyes, but just as importantly, rest of the mind. With the mind at rest, automatic and normal vision, as well as automatic and normal hearing, feeling, tasting and smelling, is possible. Under mental strain, all of our senses, including vision, don’t work as well.
Attention First, Our Eyes Will Follow
A key principle of normal and effortless vision, and an aspect of seeing primarily with our minds, is that attention always comes first.
First, we are curious and have a desire to look at something we are interested in seeing. Our mind goes there. We have a thought about it.
Then, a split second after having the thought, our eyes feel the urge to go there. They don’t hesitate. They just go there. They turn towards the thing our mind is curious about. Not because we command our eyes to go there. They just do. Unconsciously. Spontaneously. Automatically.
Then our head follows. Again, unconsciously, spontaneously and automatically. And depending on what we are wanting to see, the rest of the body might spontaneously follow as well. It’s all automatic, effortless and natural.
This “attention first” idea is an important aspect of of normal vision.
Esther Joy van der Werf, in her book Optimal Eyesight, gives a great description titled “Test Three Ways Of Eye Motion” of how attention comes first in effortless and normal eyesight. She gives directions for noticing for yourself the difference between seeing with effort, as when performing “eye exercises,” and seeing with ease, as when practicing the Bates method:
Compare Three Ways Of Eye Motion
From "Optimal Eyesight: How To Restore And Retain Great Vision" by Esther Joy van der Werf - Chapter 9, Page 66
Test Three Ways of Eye Motion
- "Within your large field of vision, pick something to your left to look at, and then also pick an object to your right. Let’s say you pick a chair to you left and a lamp to your right. First, keep your head still with nose pointing mid-way between these two objects, and move your eyes from the chair to the lamp and back. Keep your head still and only move your eyes. Do this a few times. This is the equivalent of forced eye motion typically done during eye exercises. How does it feel?
- "Now stop that, return your gaze to the center, and release your neck. Give your head permission to follow this time, yet do not purposely move your head. With eyes open and blinking, think about the chair or object to your left. What do your eyes want to do? The moment you think about the chair, your eyes naturally want to go there and look at the chair, right? Good, let your eyes go there. And what does your head want to do? It will likely want to follow your gaze. Let it follow. Now think about the lamp or the object on your right. Am I right that your eyes instantly want to jump over to the right to look at that lamp? And what does your head do? Did it follow along nicely? Go back and forth like this a few times, letting your thoughts direct your eye motion. Notice how it feels different in comparison to the first way of moving your eyes. Did you have to consciously move your eyes or your head? I expect not. Was this easier? Faster? Effortless?
- "Lastly, just to demonstrate a third option and a common misconception about the Bates Method, re-center your head between the two objects, and now move your head at the same time as your eyes. Let the head and eyes be in perfect sync as you look from the chair (or left object) to the lamp (or right object) and back a few times. How does that feel? Is it easy or is it more of an effort?
The Natural Order Of Motion
"Sometimes the differences are subtle and you may not feel a big difference between these three ways of motion, but if you exaggerate the forced eye motions of the first example and the forced head motions of the third example, you will begin to get a clearer feeling and find that the only way that your eyes move rapidly in a relaxed way is when you let them follow your attention and let the head be free to follow as needed, as in the second example. That is the natural order of motion. Your attention shifts first, your eyes rapidly follow your attention and your head follows your eyes. Slightly lagging behind but happy to come along for the ride.
"If the head does not come along, as described in the first way of eye motion above, the eyes soon feel uncomfortable looking at an angle. If the eyes are moved consciously like that, especially when done without an actual mental interest in where they are going, the movement becomes strained. If the eyes and head are kept in sync, as in the third way, a robot-like motion results where the eyes don’t get any actual movement at all, they are stuck in center position which results in both neck and eyestrain."
Where We Put Our Attention, Our Eyes Will Focus
Another principle of normal and effortless vision, and an aspect of seeing primarily with our mind, is that where we put our attention is where our eyes will focus.
When we look at an object of our attention, do we put our attention on it? Or is our attention perhaps elsewhere? Is our attention in front of the object? Behind it? Is our attention at the same distance that the object is from us? These are questions that the Bates method addresses.
In a video titled “Overview Of How To Improve Eyesight,” Gloria Ginn explains not just the importance of our eyes following our attention, but also asks the question, “At What Distance Do You Place Your Attention?”
At What Distance Do You Put Your Attention?
From "Overview Of How To Improve Eyesight" video by Gloria Ginn
The basic idea behind this method [the Bates method] is that vision is 9/10 mental and 1/10 physical. What I mean by that is that it's not so much "mind over matter," although there's nothing wrong with that, it's not that, it's simply that where do your eyes focus? How do your eyes know where to focus? What tells your eyes to focus at one distance or another distance? If you shift your eyes from something close to something in the distance, how do your eyes know to change shape? Have you ever thought about that? How do they know to change shape? What's telling the eyes to change shape?
What's changing it is the shift of mental attention. When your attention shifts from one distance to another, that sends a command through the nerves to the muscles to change the shape of the eye that immediately is focused where your attention is. You can't consciously focus your eyes all day long from one thing to another, to another, focus-refocus, focus-refocus, refocus, refocus... It's not gonna happen. So the eyes have to focus automatically, involuntarily, just like your heart beats involuntarily, you don't have to make your heart beat. It's going to happen automatically. And that's the way it is with the vision. The eyes are going to focus automatically where the attention is at any given moment in time.
So, the problem with vision is where's the attention?
When you're looking close, and you're not seeing close [clearly], the attention is farther away than where you're looking. If you're looking far, and you're not seeing in the distance clearly, the attention is actually not there. There's an effort with nearsightedness, for example, to try to pull the far object in close to see it. So you're looking here [in the distance], but mentally you're trying to bring it in here [close] to see it. so you imagine the image bigger and closer than it actually is. And then, you can't see it clearly. You're not bringing the building in close, it's gonna stay where it is. So all you do is blow up the image, which blurs the image. And then you use glasses which shrink things down to compensate for the mind blowing things up.
It’s Not What We Do, But How We Do It
When It comes to the Bates method, it’s not what we are doing, but how we are doing it. When we practice with playfulness, curiosity and interest, the Bates method techniques become less technical, less like exercises and more like fun games. We become present. Feel content. Enjoy ourselves. Smile. Laugh. And we see with greater clarity the point of our attention, what we are looking at, in the very center of our visual field. We see with central clarity., or as Dr. Bates called it “central fixation.” This is normal. And relaxing.

“The normal eye is always at rest and always has central fixation.”
– William H. Bates, M.D.
Central Fixation (Central Clarity)
As a doctor, Bates used the medical term “central fixation.” The eyes must literally stop, or fixate, for a fraction of a second in order to take a quick picture of what they are pointing at. Then they must immediately move on, and for another fraction of a second, fixate on another point of interest. And this momentary central fixation repeats over and over, with the mind receiving shap shots many times a second, so fast that we are completely unaware, except that our vision is clear, vibrant and wonderfully exciting.
What we experience when practicing central fixation is “central clarity.” If you are looking at one letter of a word with central fixation, all the other letters in the word appear less clear. When you are looking at one part of a letter with central fixation, all the other parts of the letter appear less clear. When you are looking at one tiny point of interest, that tiny point you are looking directly at, that you are putting your attention on, appears clear, and all other areas in your visual field that you are not looking at appear less clear.
“In central fixation, one sees best the point regarded while all other points are seen less clearly.”
– William H. Bates, M.D.
An Example Of Central Fixation
Below are two black periods. If you wish to see them with central fixation, you must look with your attention at each black period, one at a time.
When you look at the left period, it appears clearer than the right period. Or put another way, the right period appears blurrier or less clear than the left period.
When you look at the right period, now it appears clearer than the left period and the left period appears blurrier or less clear than the right period.
.
.
With central fixation, the period that you are looking at and have most of your attention, appears clearer than the period you are not. You are still aware of the other period, but since it is in your peripheral field, it is less clear. Central fixation is anatomically necessary to see with clarity. But it’s only in a tiny part of your central field that you can see with clarity. It’s the way the eyes were made to see. It is normal eyesight.
It is impossible to see both periods clearly at the same time. If you look at one, the other must appear less clear. If you look at the white space between the periods, both periods will be in your peripheral field, and neither one of the periods will look clear.
You must look directly at something to see it clearly. So, you must look directly at each period, one at a time, in order to see each period clearly.
Central Fixation (Central Clarity) Of The Mind
Central fixation of the eyes requires central fixation of the mind. Without mental central fixation, physical central fixation does not happen. Central fixation of the mind means thinking clearly about, or paying attention to, one thing at a time. Just as the eyes can see clearly only one thing at a time, the mind can only pay attention to, think of, remember or imagine clearly, one thing at a time.
Just as it is normal and relaxing to see one thing at a time, it is normal and relaxing to think of, remember and imagine one thing at a time. Central fixation of the mind is the opposite of “multi-tasking.” Multitasking is a strain on the mind. It’s trying to see more than one thing clearly at the say time. It’s not only impossible, trying to do so is a strain on the mind and the eyes, and lowers vision.

“Note that when the letters are read easily and clearly, they are always seen by central fixation, and relaxation is felt. Central fixation is a rest to the nerves and when practiced continuously, it relieves strain and improves the vision to normal.”
– William H. Bates, M.D.
So… What Is The Bates Method, If Not Eye Exercises?
I am a member of the Association of Vision Educators, a professional organization made up of natural vision improvement teachers and coaches, whose mission is “to increase public awareness of natural and integrated vision care and encourage education, communication and research in the field,” and whose vision is, “a world where everyone enjoys naturally optimal vision.”

Here’s what the Association of Vision Educators has to say about what the Bates method is.
What Is The Bates Method?
The Bates Method of Natural Vision Improvement is an educational approach to relearning the habits of good eyesight. It is based on the principle of dynamic relaxation and of letting go of strain in the mind and eyes. Mental strain and tense eye muscles cause blurry and distorted vision. The Bates Method applies simple techniques and easy activities that help relax the mind, release muscle tension and bring back clarity. It is not a set of eye exercises. It is relearning and incorporating into daily life the habits of Natural Vision. The Bates Method is also referred to as Natural Vision Improvement.
According to Dr. Bates, poor and worsening eyesight is caused primarily by three things:
1. Stress or mental strain
2. Poor vision habits, and
3. Wearing glasses.
And here are some Frequently Asked Questions found on the Association of Vision Educators website about the Bates Method and Natural Vision Improvement.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can eyesight improve naturally?
Yes it can.
As eyesight can worsen, it can also get better. It can fluctuate up and down, from day to day, even moment to moment. For example, it may decline in times of stress, such as during a period of grieving or while getting an eye exam. It may improve in times of rest and relaxation, while on vacation or when glasses are not worn for a period of time. Eyesight can improve through Natural Vision education.
What is Natural Vision Improvement?
Natural Vision Improvement is a holistic and educational approach to vision care that gets to the root of eyesight problems.
It addresses the cause of poor eyesight, which is stress. Relaxation and re-education of the mind and eyes are at its foundation. Bates Educators help you observe poor vision habits and find ways to relearn to see more efficiently and clearly.
How does Natural Vision Improvement work?
Eyesight issues share a common cause: stress in the mind and tension in the eyes. This can lead to using the eyes in ways for which they were not designed. Instead of the eyes seeing in a naturally relaxed way, they strain. This unconscious strain can cause chronic tension of the muscles around the eyes. The eye muscles can get stuck, squeezing the eyeball and holding it out of shape. This affects the eye’s flexibility and its ability to change shape to focus.
Natural Vision education helps to ease this unconscious tension. As natural habits of good eyesight are relearned and incorporated into daily life, the eye muscles relax. With the muscles relaxed, the eyeballs can return to their natural shape. This improves circulation and allows for proper functioning of the eye. Learning to relax and use our eyes effortlessly, without tension, allows them to return to experiencing clear vision.
Vision occurs mainly in the brain. Our eyes receive information in the form of light. The brain processes this information to make meaning of it and create our “visual world.” The process of improving our eyesight through Natural Vision education enables us to see more clearly. And seeing in a natural way, helps to bring us into greater balance and harmony with ourselves and our surroundings.
The body is an intelligent interconnected organism that wants to work correctly. Given the opportunity to function properly, it naturally will.
How did Natural Vision Improvement get started?
It began with William Horatio Bates, who was born in Newark, New Jersey in 1860. Bates graduated with a medical degree from the College of Physicians and Surgeons at Columbia University in New York in 1885. Dr. Bates became a successful and well-respected eye surgeon in New York and an instructor of ophthalmology at the New York Postgraduate Medical School and Hospital from 1886 to 1891. At various times, he also acted as advisor to school boards in the State of New York. From 1911 to 1922 he worked in outpatient clinics at the Harlem Hospital.
Early in his career, Dr. Bates became dissatisfied with conventional ophthalmological practice and began his own research into eyesight disorders. As early as 1891 Dr. Bates had learned how to help people get out of their glasses. His dissatisfaction began when he observed people whose eyesight seemed to spontaneously improve, sometimes to the point of a complete reversal of symptoms. This led him to question one of the most basic assumptions of the accepted practice of ophthalmology; namely, that once symptoms of refractive error were present in a patient, then nothing could be done other than prescribing glasses.
Dr. Bates went on to formulate new theories about eyesight and to develop a method to help people improve their vision. This method became known as The Bates Method. The Bates Method continues to be taught all over the world by professional teachers in many countries who are helping people to see better without artificial lenses or surgeries.
The term “Natural Vision Improvement” most likely started in 1987 with vision educator Janet Goodrich. It was her first book title.
What Is The Bates Method?
The Bates Method is a method of vision reeducation through relaxation of eyes and mind to regain normal, effortless eyesight, which is comprised of both central clarity and expansive peripheral vision. And unlike what you might have heard, it's quite the opposite of eye exercises.
The Bates Method is about changing your visual straining habits that caused your eyesight problem. The way to see better permanently is to apply those natural, healthy habits all day. This needs to be practiced by first noticing and feeling the strain. Nearly everyone with eyesight problems is initially not even aware of the strain in their eyes and mind. Creating that awareness and attention is the first step, just like in any other transformational process.
Consciously reversing the habits and choices you made to get your eyesight to where it is today is the key to success. This is not a quick fix! And unfortunately there is none.
The Bates Method is an educational approach to relearning the habits of good eyesight. It is based on the principle of dynamic relaxation and of letting go of strain in the mind and eyes. Mental strain and tense eye muscles cause blurry and distorted vision. It is not a set of eye exercises. It is relearning and incorporating into daily life the habits of Natural Vision that bring back visual clarity.
The Bates Method defies the traditional belief that that vision problems are genetic or age-related and therefore unavoidable. Ophthalmologist William H. Bates has shown that eyesight is highly variable and can be improved as much as it can be worsened by conscious choice and unconscious habits.
If the Bates Method works so well, why haven’t I heard of it before?
Here’s an answer from a fellow vision educator:
“The Bates Method was developed almost 100 years ago in the early 20th century but is still not accepted as credible by most of orthodox optometry. At first this may sound like a long time ago, but consider the fact that mainstream optometry is still using even older theories from the 19th century. The currently accepted theory of accommodation, presented by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1855, states that the lens is the only contributing factor to our focusing ability. Dr. Bates proved that the six extrinsic muscles around each eye work in accompaniment with the lens and both contribute to our ability to focus light properly on the retina in the back of the eye. Since the human body is highly complex and interconnected it makes sense that several muscles, not just one, work together toward accommodation.
"Not many people have heard of the Bates Method before because it has been ostracized by the medical field. Eye doctors make a living prescribing glasses for people, so anything that prevents people from needing glasses may be seen as a threat. Additionally, the Bates Method challenges the entire behemoth of the optical industry, a $35.47 billion industry according to a study conducted by the Vision Council and released by Vision Expo.” Massive medical industries do not allow any room for alternatives and do not want anyone to experience anything aside from what they offer.”
— Claudia Muehlenweg
Is Natural Vision Improvement eye exercises?
No. Exercise implies effort. It also implies the need for continuing to exercise to maintain good vision, and that if discontinued vision would decline. Rather than being about exercise, Natural Vision Improvement is about relaxation. It is about learning to let go of the strain and tension that is lowering vision. Practicing easy and gentle activities helps wake up Natural Vision. This allows the mind and eyes to function in their naturally relaxed and proper way.
Initially, these activities take conscious practice. This does take some personal responsibility and commitment to practice. But, gradually the activities become Natural Vision habits and are incorporated into daily life.
If you have any questions about the Bates Method, Natural Vision Improvement, or Natural Vision Improvement Coaching, please feel free to contact me.

Carl Vigilante
Certified Natural Vision Improvement Coach
Resources
- “The Cure of Imperfect Sight by Treatment Without Glasses” by William H. Bates
- “The Bates Method For Better Eyesight Without Glasses” by William H. Bates (revised edition of The Cure of Imperfect sight by Treatment Without Glasses))
- “Better Eyesight Magazine” by William H.l Bates and Emily C. Lierman
- “Optimal Eyesight: How To Restore And Retain Great Vision” by Esther Joy van der Werf
- “Relearning To See: Improve Your Eyesight Naturally!” by Thomas R. Quackenbush
- “Overview Of How To Improve Eyesight“, video by Gloria Ginn
- Association of Vision Educators
I am a natural vision improvement teacher and coach, massage therapist, yoga teacher and the owner of Relearn To See – Natural Vision Improvement. I take a wellness coaching approach to helping you negotiate life in a more relaxed and natural way that can benefit your eyesight, health and well-being.
Discover more from RELEARN TO SEE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.